Cellular telephone systems first discussed
The MTS system presaged many cellular developments. In December,1947 Bell Laboratories' D.H. Ring articulated the cellular concept for mobile telephony in an internal memorandum, authored by Ring with crucial assistance from W.R. Young. Mr. Young later recalled that all the elements were known then: a network of small geographical areas called cells, a low powered transmitter in each, the cell traffic controlled by a central switch, frequencies reused by different cells and so on. Young states that from 1947 Bell teams "had faith that the means for administering and connecting to many small cells would evolve by the time they were needed." [Young]The authors at SRI International, in their voluminous history of cell phones[SR1], put those early days like this:
"The earliest written description of the cellular concept appeared in a 1947 Bell Labs Technical Memorandum authored by D. H. Ring. [but see previous page, the key difference is that Ring describes true mobile telephone service, ed.] The TM detailed the concept of frequency reuse in small cells, which remained one of the key elements of cellular design from then on. The memorandum also dealt with the critical issue of handoff, stating "If more than one primary band is used, means must be provided for switching the car receiver and transmitter to the various bands." Ring does not speculate how this might be accomplished, and, in fact, his focus was on how frequencies might be best conserved in various theoretical system designs."
Here we come to an important point, one that illustrates the controlling difference between conventional mobile telephony and cellular. Note how the authors describe handoffs, a process that Mobile Telephone Service already used. The problem wasn't so much about conducting a handoff from one zone to another, but dealing with handoffs in a cellular system, one in which frequencies were used over and over again. In a cellular system you need to transfer the call from zone to zone as the mobile travels, and you need to switch the frequency it is placed on, since frequencies differ from cell to cell. See the difference? Frequency re-use is the critical and unique element of cellular, not handoffs, since conventional radio telephone systems used them as well. [Discussion] Let's get back to Young's comments, when he says that Bell teams had faith that cellular would evolve by the time it was needed.
Important conventional mobile telephone handoff patents are: Communication System with Carrier Strength Control, Henry Magunski, assignor to Motorola, Inc. U.S. 2,734,131 (1956) and Automatic Radio Telephone Switching System, R.A. Channey, assignor to Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. U.S. 3,355,556(1967)
While recognizing the Laboratories' prescience, more mobile telephones were always needed. Waiting lists developed in every city where mobile telephone service was introduced. By 1976 only 545 customers in New York City had Bell System mobiles, with 3,700 customers on the waiting list. Around the country 44,000 Bell subscribers had AT&T mobiles but 20,000 people sat on five to ten year waiting lists. [Gibson] Despite this incredible demand it took cellular 37 years to go commercial from the mobile phone's introduction. But the FCC's regulatory foot dragging slowed cellular as well. Until the 1980s they never made enough channels available; as late as 1978 the Bell System, the Independents, and the non-wireline carriers divided just 54 channels nationwide. [O'Brien] That compares to the 666 channels the first AMPS systems needed to work. Let's back up.
In mobile telephony a channel is a pair of frequencies. One frequency to transmit on and one to receive. It makes up a circuit or a complete communication path. Sounds simple enough to accommodate. Yet the radio spectrum is extremely crowded. In the late 1940s little space existed at the lower frequencies most equipment used. Inefficient radios contributed to the crowding, using a 60 kHz wide bandwidth to send an signal that can now be done with 10kHz or less. But what could you do with just six channels, no matter what the technology? With conventional mobile telephone service you had users by the scores vying for an open frequency. You had, in effect, a wireless party line, with perhaps forty subscribers fighting to place calls on each channel. Most mobile telephone systems couldn't accommodate more than 250 people. There were other problems.
Radio waves at lower frequencies travel great distances, sometimes hundreds of miles when they skip across the atmosphere. High powered transmitters gave mobiles a wide operating range but added to the dilemma. Telephone companies couldn't reuse their precious few channels in nearby cities, lest they interfere with their own systems. They needed at least seventy five miles between systems before they could use them again. While better frequency reuse techniques might have helped, something doubtful with the technology of the times, the FCC held the key to opening more channels for wireless.
In 1947 AT&T began operating a "highway service", a radio-telephone offering that provided service between New York and Boston. It operated in the 35 to 44MHz band and caused interference from to time with other distant services. Even AT&T thought the system unsuccessful. Tom Kneitel, K2AES, writing in his Tune In Telephone Calls, 3d edition, CRB Books (1996) recalls the times:
"Service in those early days was very basic, the mobile subscriber was assigned to use one specific channel, and calls from mobile units were made by raising the operator by voice and saying aloud the number being called. Mobile units were assigned distinctive telephone numbers based upon the coded channel designator upon which they were permitted to operate. A unit assigned to operate on Channel 'ZL' (33.66 Mhz base station) might be ZL-2-2849. The mobile number YJ-3-5771 was a unit assigned to work with a Channel YJ (152.63 Mhz) base station. All conversations meant pushing the button to talk, releasing it to listen."
Also in 1947 the Bell System asked the FCC for more frequencies. The FCC allocated a few more channels in 1949, but gave half to other companies wanting to sell mobile telephone service. Berresford says "these radio common carriers or RCCs, were the first FCC-created competition for the Bell System" He elaborates on the radio common carriers, a group of market driven businessmen who pushed mobile telephony in the early years further and faster than the Bell System:
"The telephone companies and the RCCs evolved differently in the early mobile telephone business. The telephone companies were primarily interested in providing ordinary, 'basic' telephone service to the masses and, therefore, gave scant attention to mobile services throughout the 1950s and 1960s. The RCCs were generally small entrepreneurs that were involved in several related businesses-- telephone answering services, private radio systems for taxicab and delivery companies, maritime and air-to-ground services, and 'beeper' paging services. As a class, the RCCs were more sales-oriented than the telephone companies and won many more customers; a few became rich in the paging business. The RCCs were also highly independent of each other; aside from sales, their specialty was litigation, often tying telephone companies (and each other) up in regulatory proceedings for years." [Berresford External Link
As proof of their competitiveness, the RCCs serviced 80,000 mobile units by 1978, twice as many as Bell. This growth built on a strong start, the introduction of automatic dialing in 1948.]
----------------------
Resources
Bullington, Kenneth "Frequency Economy in Mobile Radio Bands." Bell System Technical Journal, January 1953, Volume 32: 42 et. seq.
Douglas, V.A. "The MJ Mobile Radio Telephone System." Bell Laboratories Record December, 1964: 383
Gibson, Stephen W., Cellular Mobile Radiotelephones. Englewood Cliff: Prentice Hall, 1987. 8
McDonald, Ramsey "'Dial Direct'" Automatic Radiotelephone System. IRE Transactions on Vehicle Communications July, 1958: 80 (back to text) As a courtesy to researchers I have scanned this article for you to download and review. These are very large files but they are readable and with some work will be decent for OCR. The first image is the title page for the IRE Transactions publication. The article starts at page 80:
http://www.privateline.com/IRE/IREfrontpiece.jpg
http://www.privateline.com/IRE/page80.jpg
http://www.privateline.com/IRE/page81.jpg
http://www.privateline.com.com/IRE/page82.jpg
http://www.privateline.com.com/IRE/page83.jpg
http://www.privateline.com.com/IRE/page84.jpg
http://www.privateline.com.com/IRE/page85.jpg
[McDonald2] ibid. 84
O'Brien, James "Final Tests Begin for Mobile Telephone System." Bell Laboratories Record July/August, 1978: 171
[SRI1] David Roessner, Robert Carr, Irwin Feller, Michael McGeary, and Nils Newman, "The Role of NSF's Support of Engineering in Enabling Technological Innovation: Phase II Final report to the National Science Foundation. Arlington, VA: SRI International, 1998.
[SRI2] ibid.
Young, W.R. "Advanced Mobile Phone Service: Introduction, Background, and Objectives." Bell System Technical Journal January, 1979: 7 (back to text) Messrs. Carr. Feller, McGeary, and Newman, of SRI, supra, cite the original memo describing cellular as follows: "Mobile Telephony -- Wide Area Coverage" Bell Laboratories Technical Memorandum, December 11, 1947.
[Discussion] Some might say conventional mobile telephones already employ frequency reuse since the same frequencies are used in radio-telephone service some distance away, in other cities perhaps seventy miles or more distant. Broadcast radio and television stations use this same approach to prevent interference, where the same frequencies are used throughout the country and where each station is separated by distance or space. In cellular, though, frequency reuse goes on within the fixed wide area of a cellular carrier, as part of an overall operating system. Within the coverage area of an AM or FM radio station, by comparison, no other station can use the frequency of that station. And there is no connection between other stations to act as a network.