Private Lines
About Private Line

Private Line covers what has occurred, is occurring, and will ocurr in telecommunications. Since communication technology constantly changes, you can expect new content posted regularly.

Consider this site an authoritative resource. Its moderators have successful careers in the telecommunications industry. Utilize the content and send comments. As a site about communicating, conversation is encouraged.

Writers

Thomas Farely

Tom has produced privateline.com since 1995. He is now a freelance technology writer who contributes regularly to the site.

His knowledge of telecommunications has served, most notably, the American Heritage Invention and Technology Magazine and The History Channel.
His interview on Alexander Graham Bell will air on the History Channel the end of 2006.

Ken Schmidt

Ken is a licensed attorney who has worked in the tower industry for seven years. He has managed the development of broadcast towers nationwide and developed and built cell towers.

He has been quoted in newspapers and magazines on issues regarding cell towers and has spoke at industry and non-industry conferences on cell tower related issues.

He is recognized as an expert on cell tower leases and due diligence processes for tower acquisitions.

« Call for help from former NTT, Oki Electric, and ITT cellular people | | The Qualcomm Equation (Update) »

March 07, 2005

Posted by Tom Farley & Mark van der Hoek at 11:48 PM

Musings

The greatest factor limiting cellular radio development was not technology but spectrum, that great radio real estate space in the sky. Until the FCC assigned enough frequencies to handle large amounts of users there wasn't commercial interest. Who'd build a new, expensive system without enough customers to pay for it? Only when the FCC seemed willing to free up spectrum did the Bell System and Motorola put money and resources into fully investigating cellular. Can anyone think of another constructive invention that was limited chiefly by government regulation, not by the technology itself?

One more thought, since I am rambling. A one lane toll road cannot make as much money as a twenty-four lane toll road if there is constant demand for all those lanes. Compare that to the problem of limited spectrum or number of frequencies before the FCC allotted large blocks to cellular radio. One might argue that technology was still the limiting factor. If one could get 24 voice channels operating on a single frequency then limited spectrum wouldn't be the biggest problem. But technology has to be practical. Could you have a 24 lane toll road in the same space as a single lane? Perhaps. If you stacked each road on top of the other. But such a project would be cost prohibitive and impractical to construct. Again, we have to move away from technology and look at the limited resource that is spectrum.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Human Verification:

Article Index

Recent Posts

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2