Private Lines
About Private Line

Private Line covers what has occurred, is occurring, and will ocurr in telecommunications. Since communication technology constantly changes, you can expect new content posted regularly.

Consider this site an authoritative resource. Its moderators have successful careers in the telecommunications industry. Utilize the content and send comments. As a site about communicating, conversation is encouraged.

Writers

Thomas Farely

Tom has produced privateline.com since 1995. He is now a freelance technology writer who contributes regularly to the site.

His knowledge of telecommunications has served, most notably, the American Heritage Invention and Technology Magazine and The History Channel.
His interview on Alexander Graham Bell will air on the History Channel the end of 2006.

Ken Schmidt

Ken is a licensed attorney who has worked in the tower industry for seven years. He has managed the development of broadcast towers nationwide and developed and built cell towers.

He has been quoted in newspapers and magazines on issues regarding cell towers and has spoke at industry and non-industry conferences on cell tower related issues.

He is recognized as an expert on cell tower leases and due diligence processes for tower acquisitions.

« Secret Service Reveals Its Records Stolen By Hacker | | Dealing with customer service »

January 14, 2005

Posted by Tom Farley & Mark van der Hoek at 03:36 PM

TDMA networks to CDMA

When carriers convert their TDMA networks to CDMA they'll be tempted to reuse their cell site antennas to cut costs. Bad idea. Although we think of antennas as being technology independent they really aren't in cellular radio. And there's a different way to work with CDMA antennas. Mark van der Hoek (internal link) relates:

"I haven't worked on GSM systems myself. As to antennas, the main thing is to CONTROL YOUR PROPAGATION!!!! The GSM operators of the world are going to find out the hard way that they cannot use the same antennas for W-CDMA that they have used for GSM. You cannot frequency plan around bad sidelobes in CDMA! Be sure that you understand the different behavior of sidelobes when down tilting antennas -- few do! There is a widespread notion that down tilting an antenna causes the sidelobes to increase. This is false.

The sidelobes do NOT increase relative to where they were before. They SEEM to because the main lobe decreases, so the side lobes increase RELATIVE TO THE MAIN LOBE. But in truth, the energy at 90 degrees is NOT traveling any farther than it was.

Also, understand the difference, especially with sidelobes, in electrical vs. mechanical downtilt. And don't be afraid to combine electrical with mechanical tilt.

When mounting antennas on a rooftop, be careful to pay attention to the shadowing (and possible upward reflections) of the rooftop itself. I've seen a lot of antennas pointed into a roof, and engineers wondering why the site doesn't cover like it should!

Know your pattern, and know where you want to serve with a given sector or site, then choose an antenna that only goes where you want it! You can't adjust parameters enough to make up for poor design, especially in CDMA. Do a good design, and default parameters will work well enough. Do a poor design, and you're sunk.

More on antennas and patterns and some neat looking graphics from Mark here (internal link)

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Human Verification:

Article Index

Recent Posts

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2