Private Lines
About Private Line

Private Line covers what has occurred, is occurring, and will ocurr in telecommunications. Since communication technology constantly changes, you can expect new content posted regularly.

Consider this site an authoritative resource. Its moderators have successful careers in the telecommunications industry. Utilize the content and send comments. As a site about communicating, conversation is encouraged.

Writers

Thomas Farely

Tom has produced privateline.com since 1995. He is now a freelance technology writer who contributes regularly to the site.

His knowledge of telecommunications has served, most notably, the American Heritage Invention and Technology Magazine and The History Channel.
His interview on Alexander Graham Bell will air on the History Channel the end of 2006.

Ken Schmidt

Ken is a licensed attorney who has worked in the tower industry for seven years. He has managed the development of broadcast towers nationwide and developed and built cell towers.

He has been quoted in newspapers and magazines on issues regarding cell towers and has spoke at industry and non-industry conferences on cell tower related issues.

He is recognized as an expert on cell tower leases and due diligence processes for tower acquisitions.

« Just in! 3:00 p.m. (PST) update | | Inventions after their time »

September 14, 2004

Posted by Tom Farley & Mark van der Hoek at 09:38 PM

From American Hero to Kook in the Basement

Evan I. Schwartz in In "Sparking the Fire of Invention" (MIT Technology Review) contends individual inventors and small research labs are returning to prominence. When the U.S. Census in 1940 eliminated "Inventor" as an occupation, replacing it with "Researcher", it changed the status of inventors. No longer independent, iconic, rugged American symbols, these people were now thought of as kooks in the basement. More recently, kooks in the garage.

Schwartz writes, "The change marks a comeback for those iconoclastic souls who still call themselves inventors -- the people considered the driving force of the economy in the days of Thomas Edison, Alexander Graham Bell, and the Wright brothers. From the 1920s and '30s onward, with the rise of giant technology-based companies like GE, AT&T, and DuPont, invention became co-opted by corporate labs that had to answer to management hierarchies. Within corporate labs, inventors were reclassified as 'researchers.' In 1932, the year after Edison died, more U.S. patents were granted to corporations than to individuals for the first time, and in 1940, the U.S. Census Bureau eliminated "inventor" as a job category.

"The new climate for invention, say Myhrvold and others, is the result of four major trends. The first is the reemergence of invention outside big corporations. For nearly a century, the innovations of large corporate research centers such as Bell Labs or General Electric overshadowed those of inventors working alone or in small groups. But now a constellation of forces is bringing the individual inventor and small technology companies -- and sometimes small teams within large firms -- back to the fore."

I'd link directly to the article but The Review is for subscribers only. So do this: use the Google search box above to search for this article. The return you'll want is: Technology Review: Sparking the Fire of Invention. It will list an MIT site. Hit the "Cached" version. That will give you the article without you having to subscribe. Yes, we Americans are indeed an inventive lot.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Human Verification:

Article Index

Recent Posts

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2