Private Lines
About Private Line

Private Line covers what has occurred, is occurring, and will ocurr in telecommunications. Since communication technology constantly changes, you can expect new content posted regularly.

Consider this site an authoritative resource. Its moderators have successful careers in the telecommunications industry. Utilize the content and send comments. As a site about communicating, conversation is encouraged.

Writers

Thomas Farely

Tom has produced privateline.com since 1995. He is now a freelance technology writer who contributes regularly to the site.

His knowledge of telecommunications has served, most notably, the American Heritage Invention and Technology Magazine and The History Channel.
His interview on Alexander Graham Bell will air on the History Channel the end of 2006.

Ken Schmidt

Ken is a licensed attorney who has worked in the tower industry for seven years. He has managed the development of broadcast towers nationwide and developed and built cell towers.

He has been quoted in newspapers and magazines on issues regarding cell towers and has spoke at industry and non-industry conferences on cell tower related issues.

He is recognized as an expert on cell tower leases and due diligence processes for tower acquisitions.

« 1XRTT (CDMA2000 1X) is pretty widespread | | Short Note »

August 24, 2004

Posted by Tom Farley & Mark van der Hoek at 10:07 PM

Q&A by Mark van der Hoek on 1XRTT/CDMA2000 1X

Q: Whose behind all these crazy names with CDMA?

A. Who is behind EVERYTHING CDMA? :D Qualcomm, of course. It was originally called a 2.5G technology, but Qualcomm muscled the ITU to call it 3G. After all, who wants 2.5 when you can have 3?

A. Coherent detection on the reverse link. Just like the cell sites have a pilot, now the mobiles have a pilot. That enables much better power control on the mobiles, which means greater capacity on the reverse link. Add to that now we have "supplemental channels". Instead of assigning just ONE traffic channel, now we can assign up to 7 to one mobile. The data is fed in parallel across all of them, thus increasing the data throughput. There are also some differences in coding schemes.

Q. Are data rates measured while the cell phone is moving or stationary?

A. Probably stationary.

Q. And do those data rates continue throughout the handoff?

A. No, supplemental channels are not handed off -- just the fundamental channel. However, the supplementals are added back right after handoff, so you shouldn't notice much.

Q. What's the real speed in practice with Vision or Express? 45 to 60 kbs?

A. That's what Verizon claims for Express, and that's what I've heard from folks in the field. Basically really good dial up. Nothing to get excited about, but usable surfing. I suspect those speeds are stationary, though, and don't expect that at the cell edge.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Human Verification:

Article Index

Recent Posts

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2