Private Lines
About Private Line

Private Line covers what has occurred, is occurring, and will ocurr in telecommunications. Since communication technology constantly changes, you can expect new content posted regularly.

Consider this site an authoritative resource. Its moderators have successful careers in the telecommunications industry. Utilize the content and send comments. As a site about communicating, conversation is encouraged.

Writers

Thomas Farely

Tom has produced privateline.com since 1995. He is now a freelance technology writer who contributes regularly to the site.

His knowledge of telecommunications has served, most notably, the American Heritage Invention and Technology Magazine and The History Channel.
His interview on Alexander Graham Bell will air on the History Channel the end of 2006.

Ken Schmidt

Ken is a licensed attorney who has worked in the tower industry for seven years. He has managed the development of broadcast towers nationwide and developed and built cell towers.

He has been quoted in newspapers and magazines on issues regarding cell towers and has spoke at industry and non-industry conferences on cell tower related issues.

He is recognized as an expert on cell tower leases and due diligence processes for tower acquisitions.

« Wireless company names and the technologies they use | | Confusing CDMA names »

August 18, 2004

Posted by Tom Farley & Mark van der Hoek at 10:15 PM

More on cellular carrier names

Cellular One began in 1984 as the name for the first non-wireline cellular system in the Baltimore/Washington D.C. area. Delighted with the moniker the partners making up Cellular One decided to cheaply license it throughout the U.S.A. Soon, Cellular One seemed everywhere, although no one company was behind it. As Murray in Wireless Nation (Perseus, 2001) relates:

"It's very likely no one outside the D.C. metropolitan area would ever have heard the name Cellular One if it hadn't been for a second decision the group made. In a brilliant stroke, the partnership decided to license the name, making it available to other non wireline systems essentially for free. The wirelines, many with their RBOC roots and Bell names, had the automatic advantage of regional name recognition, an advantage that threatened to overpower the nonwireline's scattershot marketing strategies."

"But following the decision to license the 'Cellular One' name, it gradually spread across the country, eventually gaining even greater recognition than any one of the names of the giant AT&T offspring. Through there was in fact no national 'Cellular One' company, soon the ubiquity of the name had the effect the nonwirelines hoped: Consumers knew it and trusted it. At last, the nonwirelines had found an advantage of their own."

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Human Verification:

Article Index

Recent Posts

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2