Private Lines
About Private Line

Private Line covers what has occurred, is occurring, and will ocurr in telecommunications. Since communication technology constantly changes, you can expect new content posted regularly.

Consider this site an authoritative resource. Its moderators have successful careers in the telecommunications industry. Utilize the content and send comments. As a site about communicating, conversation is encouraged.

Writers

Thomas Farely

Tom has produced privateline.com since 1995. He is now a freelance technology writer who contributes regularly to the site.

His knowledge of telecommunications has served, most notably, the American Heritage Invention and Technology Magazine and The History Channel.
His interview on Alexander Graham Bell will air on the History Channel the end of 2006.

Ken Schmidt

Ken is a licensed attorney who has worked in the tower industry for seven years. He has managed the development of broadcast towers nationwide and developed and built cell towers.

He has been quoted in newspapers and magazines on issues regarding cell towers and has spoke at industry and non-industry conferences on cell tower related issues.

He is recognized as an expert on cell tower leases and due diligence processes for tower acquisitions.

« More on cellular carrier names | | CDMA schemes »

August 19, 2004

Posted by Tom Farley & Mark van der Hoek at 10:11 PM

Confusing CDMA names

Cellular's original spread spectrum scheme was IS-95. That name comes from the standard (internal link) outlining its operation. It was also called CDMA but that is a generic term which is inherently confusing. IS-95 is CDMA, but not all code division multiple access plans are IS-95.

Capitalizing on CDMA's name recognition, however, the CDG Group now incorporates that acronym into titles for their future spread spectrum plans. These names incorporate revision numbers which make them difficult to relate to and remember. The goal though is straightforward: an always on connection, fast data rates, and an all IP network (internal link, discussion of circuit and packet switching.) .

Graphic from the CDG Group: http://cdg.org/ (external link)

Read how many poor names have been used along the development path. "[We'll introduce the] world's first third generation (3G) services later this year using IMT-2000 CDMA Multi-Carrier 1X technology (1X). This technology has been called many names in its development history - CDMA2000 phase 1, 1XRTT, 3G CDMA 1X - but regardless of the naming convention applied, it is the same set of advanced capabilities that promise to introduce the world to 3G in commercial form." Sheesh.

To back up a little, cdmaOne is the marketing term for IS-95 (A), the original CDMA scheme, and IS-(B). In America we still have IS-95 (A); (B) never got going. Now we come to other CDMA services, some of which we won't see for many years:

"CDMA2000 represents a family of technologies that includes

1) CDMA2000 1X and

2) CDMA2000 1xEV.

CDMA2000 1X can double the voice capacity of cdmaOne networks and delivers peak packet data speeds of 307 kbps in mobile environments.

CDMA2000 1xEV includes:

a) CDMA2000 1xEV-DO. [Data only or optimized] This delivers peak data speeds of 2.4Mbps and supports applications such as MP3 transfers and video conferencing.

b) CDMA2000 1xEV-DV. [Data and Voice] This provides integrated voice and simultaneous high-speed packet data multimedia services at speeds of up to 3.09 Mbps."

"1xEV-DO and 1xEV-DV are both backward compatible with CDMA2000 1X and cdmaOne."

The ski graphics below are my attempt at visualizing the differences between the services.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Human Verification:

Article Index

Recent Posts

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2