Private Lines
About Private Line

Private Line covers what has occurred, is occurring, and will ocurr in telecommunications. Since communication technology constantly changes, you can expect new content posted regularly.

Consider this site an authoritative resource. Its moderators have successful careers in the telecommunications industry. Utilize the content and send comments. As a site about communicating, conversation is encouraged.

Writers

Thomas Farely

Tom has produced privateline.com since 1995. He is now a freelance technology writer who contributes regularly to the site.

His knowledge of telecommunications has served, most notably, the American Heritage Invention and Technology Magazine and The History Channel.
His interview on Alexander Graham Bell will air on the History Channel the end of 2006.

Ken Schmidt

Ken is a licensed attorney who has worked in the tower industry for seven years. He has managed the development of broadcast towers nationwide and developed and built cell towers.

He has been quoted in newspapers and magazines on issues regarding cell towers and has spoke at industry and non-industry conferences on cell tower related issues.

He is recognized as an expert on cell tower leases and due diligence processes for tower acquisitions.

« CDMA schemes | | 1XRTT (CDMA2000 1X) is pretty widespread »

August 22, 2004

Posted by Tom Farley & Mark van der Hoek at 10:09 PM

2.5G Land, more musings on CDMA

Sprint PCS offers upbanded IS-95 (A), that is, IS-95 (A) placed at a higher frequency than conventional cellular. Still, the same technology other carriers have used since the mid-1990s, although now tweaked a bit. They claim their "Vision" service gives data speeds averaging 50-70 kbps, with peak speeds of 144kbps. That 144 would be their network speed, not what you would normally experience. And all of this is one fifth the speed needed to be considered 3G. Let's call their Vision service 2.5G.

Sprint claims greater nationwide coverage than any other carrier. Even here in heavily populated California Sprint does not cover the Highway 50 corridor to Lake Tahoe, barely any of the Sierra Nevada foothills, and little of the Sacramento Delta. It seems you can call yourself a nationwide network if you just list cities around the country, leaving huge gaps between. And how do you fill in those gaps?

How about cell sites costing one half million to one million dollars every seven miles across the entire United States? Yes, that's impossible. There's not enough people making calls to justify building such infrastructure. Better coverage and 3G and all the wonderful wireless services predicted for the last several years will never happen where it does not make economic sense to the carrier. Your nationwide coverage maps will look as they do now: like a slice of Swiss cheese. More later.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Human Verification:

Article Index

Recent Posts

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2