Private Lines
About Private Line

Private Line covers what has occurred, is occurring, and will ocurr in telecommunications. Since communication technology constantly changes, you can expect new content posted regularly.

Consider this site an authoritative resource. Its moderators have successful careers in the telecommunications industry. Utilize the content and send comments. As a site about communicating, conversation is encouraged.

Writers

Thomas Farely

Tom has produced privateline.com since 1995. He is now a freelance technology writer who contributes regularly to the site.

His knowledge of telecommunications has served, most notably, the American Heritage Invention and Technology Magazine and The History Channel.
His interview on Alexander Graham Bell will air on the History Channel the end of 2006.

Ken Schmidt

Ken is a licensed attorney who has worked in the tower industry for seven years. He has managed the development of broadcast towers nationwide and developed and built cell towers.

He has been quoted in newspapers and magazines on issues regarding cell towers and has spoke at industry and non-industry conferences on cell tower related issues.

He is recognized as an expert on cell tower leases and due diligence processes for tower acquisitions.

« How cell phones are produced | | Major problems with WAP predicted four years ago »

March 11, 2004

Posted by Tom Farley & Mark van der Hoek at 12:56 AM

What's T-Mobile's Problem?

Dear Tom:

I have a T-Mobile (external link) cell site on my commercial property in Tempe, AZ. The lease called for a 20 foot by 20 foot site or 400 square feet at $700.00 per month. After construction the site ended up being 30 feet by 31.5 feet or 956 sq feet. That's more than double what they agreed to so I've asked for twice as much rent. They've refused, only offering another $150, and now they've even pulled back that offer. They told me, and I quote, "You're not using that property." Help!

I've been through mediation and trying to evict them will cost thousands of dollars. I'm told this is a "footprint" problem. It seems most landlords do not check the size of the site after construction or if they do find out more land was taken there's little or nothing to be done about it. I think they lied about the square footage to get a lower monthly rate. Now what? Know anyone else with a problem like this? I'm thinking about a class action lawsuit.

Dear Reader:

Check the USENET to see if there are other people with the same problem. Go to Google and select "Groups" from their home page. If there are any lawyers who would like to help this person then let me know. Contact me through my contact page.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Human Verification:

Article Index

Recent Posts

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2