Private Lines
About Private Line

Private Line covers what has occurred, is occurring, and will ocurr in telecommunications. Since communication technology constantly changes, you can expect new content posted regularly.

Consider this site an authoritative resource. Its moderators have successful careers in the telecommunications industry. Utilize the content and send comments. As a site about communicating, conversation is encouraged.

Writers

Thomas Farely

Tom has produced privateline.com since 1995. He is now a freelance technology writer who contributes regularly to the site.

His knowledge of telecommunications has served, most notably, the American Heritage Invention and Technology Magazine and The History Channel.
His interview on Alexander Graham Bell will air on the History Channel the end of 2006.

Ken Schmidt

Ken is a licensed attorney who has worked in the tower industry for seven years. He has managed the development of broadcast towers nationwide and developed and built cell towers.

He has been quoted in newspapers and magazines on issues regarding cell towers and has spoke at industry and non-industry conferences on cell tower related issues.

He is recognized as an expert on cell tower leases and due diligence processes for tower acquisitions.

« No Dumb Questions | | Japan Inc. gets ready to roll »

April 09, 2001

Posted by Tom Farley & Mark van der Hoek at 11:59 PM

Is there a difference between digital cellular technology and digital PCS?

The similarity is that all modern radio-telephone service is, for the most part, cellular radio. A base station and an antenna provides coverage within a small geographical area called a cell. Networking many of those stations, called cell sites, allows roaming between the individual cells. This wireless wide area network lets a carrier provide coverage to a city or a town. Cooperative agreements with other carriers allow people to roam outside their normal coverage area. Most notably, cellular employs frequency reuse. The same set of frequencies are used over and over within a given area, to make the most economical use of the radio spectrum. No matter how the radio works, be it PCS or conventional cellular, no matter the enabling transmission technology, say TDMA or CDMA, it is all cellular radio, since distributed cell sites, employing frequency reuse, make up a wireless network.

(Just go here and it will all be explained :-) Cellular telephone basics)

PCS generally refers to cellular radio at higher frequencies. PCS is "all digital" compared to conventional cellular which is a hybrid of analog and digital routines. Being purely digital, though, is not necessarily a good thing. Quite often the all digital services lack coverage since more base stations are required. Audio quality can suffer terribly, with analog still superior. As wireless evolves the different services may operate on high and low frequencies as needed, thus blurring the defining lines between the technologies.

AT&T's IS-136 service, for example, an all digital evolution of conventional cellular, can operate on high and low frequency radio bands as needed. Depending on what the local carrier offers, it even changes its operating method, dropping back to analog cellular service where digital service isn't provided. Thus, IS-136 provides many "PCS like" services where it can, and in areas where it can't, it at least lets you talk and complete calls. I am a fan of this system.

GSM or PCS, besides being all digital, and designed in Europe with no thought of being compatible with conventional cellular systems, does differ from standard cellular in the way it makes and sends calls. The difference is in the thousands of details. But in the end it is all cellular radio.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Human Verification:

Article Index

Recent Posts

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2